When negotiating and drafting a contract on behalf of a business, one of the most important considerations is whether it will create personal liability for the individual signing on behalf of the business.
Bar Bulletin: Opposing counsel who can get along this summer can earn a free drink from Charles B. Jimerson.
This blog post is part IV in a series of posts providing an overview of important considerations for commercial lease agreements. Regardless of whether a landlord or tenant, there are numerous issues that all parties should consider prior to entering into a commercial lease agreement. Part I addressed mandatory and suggested commercial lease agreement terms and the legal duties and obligations of the parties involved. Part II discussed the enforceability of certain lease agreements, tort liability for both landlords and tenants, and the use of personal guarantees. Part III focused on the tenant’s remedies, claims and defenses when a landlord breaches the commercial lease agreement. This fourth and final post in this series will discuss the landlord’s remedies, claims and defenses for breaches by the tenant.
This blog post is part III in a series of blogs posts discussing the recovery of attorneys’ fees. Part I explored some considerations in the recovery of attorneys’ fees when the recovery is by virtue of a contractual provision. Part II discussed the statutory entitlement to fees and issues related to entitlement. This blog post will discuss common law exceptions to the general rule that generally requires a contractual or statutory basis for the recovery of attorneys’ fees. Specifically, this blog post will discuss four general common law exceptions that may provide a basis for the recovery of attorneys’ fees: (1) wrongful act doctrine; (2) inequitable conduct doctrine; (3) creation of a common fund; and (4) attempt to preserve assets in a trust.
Many vendors have had the unfortunate experience of a customer filing for bankruptcy. If it hasn’t happened to you yet, it probably will at some point in the future. There are certain steps a vendor should (or must) take to protect itself and maximize its opportunity to collect any debts owed by the customer. Vendors that take advantage of these protections can maximize recoveries, better preserve their positions in their dealings with the debtor, and avoid pitfalls inherent in the bankruptcy process. Vendors, and their attorneys, should use this checklist and take immediate action when a customer files for bankruptcy.
Featured in the May 2016 Issue Partner’s Perspective: Putting Things in Perspective: How a Son Survived Being Injected with HIV by His Father J&C Welcomes New Associate: Suzanne H. Clark J&C Participates in YMCA’s First Coast Games New Law Blogs Curiosities, Ruminations and Various Eccentricities of Firm Biz Click to […]
If an LLC sustains a loss that causes the company to lose value, its members are never pleased. However, that loss is compounded when that member believes the loss was due to the tortious conduct of another LLC member. This scenario presents an interesting, and increasingly frequent, issue of Florida law: when does a member of an LLC have individual standing to bring suit against fellow members— i.e. a direct action—as opposed to having to file a derivative claim on behalf of the LLC?
As the construction industry continues to boom, joint ventures have become increasingly common for contractors. Entering into a joint venture with another company can have enormous upside: it can provide a contractor with access to a new market, a broader geographic reach, new building techniques or knowledge, access to new and evolving equipment, and additional financing and bonding capacity. Further, a joint venture instantly increases working capital, manpower, equipment, specialized expertise and talent, and other resources that can be committed to a large project. Lastly, by allocating risk associated with a project among two or more contractors, each contractor’s risk is reduced.
How should you determine the most effective way to present your case, while at the same time maximizing information the trier of fact is able to retain? It is a well-known fact that individuals learn in many different ways. Accordingly, this makes it increasingly difficult for litigators to decide on […]
An involuntary bankruptcy case is typically commenced by a petition joined by at least three petitioning creditors. However, an involuntary petition may be filed by a single petitioning creditor if the debtor has 11 or fewer “qualified” creditors. This is often called the “numerosity” requirement. The Bankruptcy Code, in Section 303(b)(2), expressly defines which creditors count in the numerosity requirement. In determining whether there are 11 or fewer creditors, certain creditors are ignored, including (a) any employees of the debtor who are also creditors, (4) any “insiders” of the debtor who are creditors, and (3) any creditors who received voidable transfers under §§ 544, 545, 547, 548, or 724(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.